Owning a percentage of your account equal to the VIX feels disciplined. Across 4,850 trading days it still lagged buy-and-hold by a wide margin.
Here is a rule that sounds smart. Let the VIX tell you how much stock to own. If the VIX reads 20, put 20% of your account into the S&P 500. If it falls to 15, sell some and hold 15%. If fear spikes to 40, buy up to 40%.
The appeal is easy to see. You own more when everyone is scared and prices have already fallen, and you own less when everyone is calm and prices are high. We tested it on 4,850 daily closes, from December 2006 through July 2026, which covers the 2008 crash, the 2020 crash and the 2022 bear market.
We ran two sizes of the same idea:
Both rebalance every day as the VIX moves. Neither borrows money, so the position is capped at 100% of the account. Anything not in stock sits in cash, and in the main test that cash earns nothing. That last assumption turns out to matter a great deal, so we come back to it below.
| Strategy | $100,000 Became | Return / Year | Worst Drop | Avg Invested |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Buy and hold | $528,146 | 9.03% | −56.5% | 100% |
| VIX 1.5x | $212,782 | 4.00% | −30.5% | 30% |
| VIX 1x | $175,781 | 2.97% | −19.8% | 20% |
Neither version came close to buy and hold. Simply holding turned $100,000 into about $528,000, against $213,000 for the 1.5x rule and $176,000 for the 1x rule.
Most of that gap is because the rule keeps you only 20% to 30% invested on average, so you sit out most of a market that spends most of its time rising.
The fair test is whether the VIX is doing useful work, or whether you would have done just as well owning a fixed slice of stock and never touching it. So we compared each version against holding its own average size every single day.
| Rule | Return / Year | Same Size, Fixed | Added by the VIX |
|---|---|---|---|
| VIX 1x (avg 20% invested) | 2.97% | 2.05% | +0.93% |
| VIX 1.5x (avg 30% invested) | 4.00% | 3.03% | +0.98% |
Both beat their fixed-size counterparts by roughly one percentage point a year. The VIX is clearly contributing something real. Buying more after fear spikes gets you better prices, and that advantage shows up in the return.
That extra return is not free. The worst drop for the 1x rule was −19.8%, against −13.8% for its fixed-size counterpart. For the 1.5x rule it was −30.5% against −20.2%. In both cases the losses grew faster than the gains.
The reason is baked into the rule. The VIX reaches its highest levels during a crash, so the rule puts you at your largest size during ongoing market crashes.
| Date | VIX | 1x Invested | 1.5x Invested |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 27, 2008 | 80.1 | 80% | 100% |
| Mar 16, 2020 | 82.7 | 83% | 100% |
| Jun 16, 2022 | 33.0 | 33% | 50% |
You buy the dip, and then the dip keeps dropping. That is where the deeper losses come from.
These rules park 70% to 80% of the account in cash, so the interest that cash earns matters more than anything else in the test. The main table above assumes it earns zero, the harshest possible reading.
| Strategy | Cash at 0% | Cash at 2% | Cash at 4% | Worst Drop |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Buy and hold | 9.04% | 9.04% | 9.04% | −56.5% |
| VIX 1.5x | 4.00% | 5.46% | 6.91% | −30.5% |
| VIX 1x | 2.98% | 4.62% | 6.26% | −19.8% |
With cash at 4%, close to recent Treasury bill yields, the 1x rule earns 6.26% a year with a worst drop of only 19.8%. That is a much smoother ride than buy and hold, which lost more than half its value at the bottom in 2009. Notice too that the two rules converge: the gap between them shrinks to about 0.65 points a year, while the difference in worst drop stays close to 11 points. When cash pays you, the smaller 1x version is the better of the two.
The VIX moves every day, so these rules trade constantly. Commissions on trading volume are not deducted above, so treat the returns as the best case.
TradeIntel’s VIX Zone Analyzer shows what has happened once the VIX enters a given range, including the odds it keeps climbing versus settling back down.
Open the VIX Zone Analyzer
Comments
Loading comments…